Legal Opinion

United States v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided March 27, 1963No. Crim. No. 62-286PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CAFFREY, District Judge.

The five individual and three corporate defendants filed a series of substantially *657identical motions. In addition a claim of immunity, to prosecution was asserted by the defendant William C. Welden. The motions will be dealt with seriatim.

I. The Motions for Bills of Particulars. The indictment filed herein, which was drawn in clear and simple language, sufficiently apprises each defendant of the nature of the offenses charged to enable him or it to prepare a defense and to protect each defendant from any risk of double jeopardy. Russell v. United States, 369 U.S. 749,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. MoniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. McDonald v. MabeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Bowers v. New York & Albany Lighterage Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Himmelfarb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States Ex Rel. Laino v. Warden of Wallkill PrisonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API