Oeland v. Neuman Transit Company
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
'PER CURIAM.
In petitioning for rehearing appellees challenge the accuracy of statements appearing in bur original opinion giving •summary of testimony by the only surviving ' eyewitness of the accident.
Under such circumstances we meticulously reexamined the criticized statements of the opinion and carefully compared them with the witness’ testimony as it appears in the record. By doing so we not only find the summarized statements in the opinion to be completely accurate and justified, but that the testimonies relied upon were not taken out of the context of the line of examination in which…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Danculovich v. BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- DeWitty v. DeckerWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
- Davis v. Consolidated Oil & Gas, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1990
- Terry v. MooreWyoming Supreme Court · 1968
- Jackson v. Gelco Leasing CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.