Legal Opinion
Palmer v. City of Monticello
District Court, D. Utah
Decided March 5, 1990No. Civ. 89-C-762APublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
ALDON J. ANDERSON, Senior District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The Plaintiff alleges eight causes of action against the City of Monticello and the city’s Chief of Police, Kent Adair. The first and second causes of action are brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging a due process violation. The first cause of action alleges deprivation of a property interest and the second deprivation of a liberty interest. The sixth cause of action alleges that plaintiff was terminated for exercising his First Amendment rights. The rest are…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Beedle v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Brett G. Palmer v. City of Monticello and Kent Adair, Individually and as Chief of PoliceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Poulsen v. Cache Valley Transit DistrictDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2019