Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 16, 1918No. 9791PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Conviction of manslaughter; from Jasper superior court—Judge Park. April 30, 1918.

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

1. Grounds 4 and 5 of the motion for new trial can not be considered by this court, because it does not appear in the former that any objection was made to the admission of the evidence and passed upon by the court at the time the evidence was offered. Cooper y. Chamblee, 114 Ga. 116 (39 S. E. 917); Tilley v. McJunkin, 116 Ga. 426 (42 S. E. 741); City of Atlanta v. Sciple, 19 Ga. App. 694 (92 S. E. 28), and cases cited. Ground 5 can not be determined without, reference to other parts of the.record. “No ground of a motion for new trial which is not complete and understandable without resorting…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Green v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Wynne v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
  3. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  4. Crawford v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
  5. Cain v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kimball v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  2. McRae v. BoykinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  3. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  4. Maner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  5. New York Life Insurance v. IttnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API