Legal Opinion · Dissent

O Centro Espirita Beneficiente Uniao Do Vegetal v. Ashcroft

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 4, 2003No. 02-2323Published

1DissentMurphy, Circuit Judge

The majority affirms a preliminary injunction prohibiting the United States1 from enforcing the Controlled Substances Act (“CSA”), 21 U.S.C. § 801 et seq., thereby placing the United States in violation of the United Nations Convention on Psychotropic Substances, Feb. 21, 1971 (the “Convention”), 32 U.S.T. 543. Because the majority utilizes the wrong standard in determining whether 0 Centro Espirita Beneficíente Uniao do Vegetal (“UDV”) has made the necessary showing for obtaining a preliminary injunction, and because UDV has not shown that the preliminary injunction factors weigh heavily and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Sumitomo Shoji America, Inc. v. AvaglianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Zicherman Ex Rel. Estate of Kole v. Korean Air Lines Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Kolovrat v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. NEW MOTOR VEHICLE BOARD OF CALIFORNIA v. ORRIN W. FOX CO. Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API