Legal Opinion

Roberts Electric Supply Co. v. Kidder

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 11, 1926No. Appeal 67Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Trexler, J.,

The plaintiff filed his statement, the defendant his affidavit of defense. A rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense was entered. By leave of court, the defendant filed a supplementary affidavit of defense. The court thereafter made the rule for judgment absolute.

The defendant contends that before the court could enter judgment, an amended ¡affidavit having been filed, a new rule should have been entered. To this proposition we cannot assent. An amended affidavit is not a new one. It is merely a change or amplification of the original and is' to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bank of Hooversville v. SagersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. First National Bank v. BaerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. First National Bank v. LawallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API