Legal Opinion

Jaimes v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 9, 2010No. SC09-1694PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuince, J.

We have for review the decision of the Second District Court of Appeal in Jaimes v. State, 19 So.3d 347 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009). Aniceto Jaimes challenges his conviction for aggravated battery by causing great bodily harm on the grounds that the “great bodily harm” version of aggravated battery, although contained in the jury instructions, was not charged in the information that was filed against him by the State. Below, the Second District held that because Jaimes’s attorney failed to object to the jury instructions at trial, the error was not preserved for appellate review. Citing this Court’s…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Cole v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. State v. DelvaSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  4. Ray v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  5. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1960

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Universal Insurance Co. of North America v. WarfelSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
  2. Daniels v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
  3. Hayes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
  4. Conahan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
  5. United States v. Ernest Vereen, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API