People v. Young
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The People’s obligation to produce the pretrial statements of prosecution witnesses is limited to that material which is in the People’s possession or control (see People v Tissois, 72 NY2d 75 [1988]). The handwritten notes of a caseworker for the New York City Administration for Children’s Services were not in the possession or control of the prosecution and, thus, did not constitute Rosario material (see People v Rosario, 9 NY2d 286, 290 [1961]; People v Tissois, 72 NY2d 75 [1988]; People v White, 210 AD2d 447 [1994]).
There is no merit to the defendant’s contention that the testimony of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. RosarioNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- People v. McDanielNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. SpicolaNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- People v. TissoisNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. PersaudAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. Herrera-MachucaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020