Legal Opinion
State v. Hurst
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided October 6, 1992No. CR92-21PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
606 So.2d 965 (1992)
STATE of Louisiana, Appellee,
v.
Walter Wayne HURST, Jr., Appellant.
No. CR92-21.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.
October 6, 1992.
G. Paul Marx, Lafayette, for defendant-appellant.
Michael Harson, Asst. Dist. Atty., Lafayette, for plaintiff-appellee.
Before STOKER and KNOLL, JJ., and MARCANTEL,[*] J. Pro Tem.
BERNARD M. MARCANTEL, Judge Pro Tem.
The issues presented by this appeal are (1) whether the trial court erred in not permitting defendant to present certain witnesses and evidence in defense of the charge of aggravated rape; (2) whether the trial court erred in…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State of West Virginia v. Donald DunnWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. DorseyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
- State v. LopezIdaho Court of Appeals · 1995