Legal Opinion
The Florida Bar v. Teitelman
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided April 5, 1972No. 41290PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
261 So.2d 140 (1972)
THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,
v.
Harry H. TEITELMAN, Petitioner.
No. 41290.
Supreme Court of Florida.
April 5, 1972.
Lyle D. Holcomb, Jr., Edward J. Atkins, Miami, Earl Drayton Farr, Jr., Punta Gorda, and Norman A. Faulkner, Tallahassee, for complainant, The Florida Bar.
Leo Greenfield, of Street & Greenfield, Miami, for petitioner, Harry H. Teitelman.
DEKLE, Justice.
Although this is a disciplinary proceeding for a "private" reprimand pursuant to Integration Rule of The Florida Bar, Art. XI, Rule 11.09(3) (f), 32 F.S.A., it has apparently reached us with an overriding purpose of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- State ex rel. Indiana State Bar Ass'n v. Indiana Real Estate Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1963
- Pioneer Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. State Bar of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1958
- Keyes Co. v. Dade County Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
- State Bar of Michigan v. KuprisMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
3Cited by6 opinions
- The Florida Bar v. American Legal and Business Forms, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1973
- John D. Sibley v. The Federal Land Bank of New Orleans, and Board of Commissioners of the Mississippi State Bar, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- The Florida Bar v. IrizarrySupreme Court of Florida · 1972
- The Florida Bar v. StupicaSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
- Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.