Legal Opinion

Limpert v. Garland

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 1979PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Rudolph U. Johnson, J.

Defendants, Philip Garland, Jr. and Arlene Garland, by notice of motion, seek an order pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a] , par 5) dismissing the cause of action of the plaintiffs, Richard Limpert and Jean Limpert.

This cause of action, arising out of a fall down accident, accrued on December 29, 1975. In accord with CPLR 203 (subd [b] , par 5), a copy of plaintiffs’ summonses was delivered to the Sheriff of Erie County on December 29, 1978 and substituted service was thereafter made on January 12, 1979.

Defendants maintain that this service was…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bal v. Court Employment Project, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  2. Marinelli v. SrokaNew York Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Wilson v. Metropolitan Property & Liability InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Parker v. MackNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API