Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Hickey v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 5, 1978No. CR78-17Published

1ConcurrenceJohn A. Fogleman, Justice

I concur in the denial of the petition for rehearing only because the trial judge overruled a specific and proper objection to the prejudicial evidence. The presumption that a trial judge considers only competent evidence is only a presumption which is overcome when there is an indication that the trial judge did give some consideration to inadmissible evidence. See Mason v. Morel, 234 Ark. 660, 354 S.W. 2d 19, cited by the state. In the context in which this objection and ruling were made, the usual presumption should not be applicable.

I am authorized to state that Mr. Justice Hickman joins…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mason v. MorelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API