Legal Opinion

Buck v. Fitzgerald

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1898PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Ravalli County; Fra/nk Woody, Judge.' Application for an injunction by Henry Buck against-James T. Fitzgerald, as county clerk, etc. From an order refusing the same, the plaintiff appeals.

1Per curiam

— This is an appeal from an order refusing an application for an injunction to restrain- the county clerk of Ravalli county from so preparing the official ballot for the election of November 8, 1898, as to include therein the question of the removal of the county seat from Stevensville to Hamilton. The complaint was attacked by demurrer. The demurrer was sustained, and the injunction refused. The case was submitted on yesterday, and to preserve the rights of the parties immediate decision is necessary.

1. The defendant assails the complaint upon the ground that it does not show that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Buck v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Milligan v. City of Miles CityMontana Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Osmers v. FureyMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Garry v. MartinMontana Supreme Court · 1924
  4. O'Rourke v. SchultzMontana Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Bates v. Mayor of NomeDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API