Legal Opinion

Biel v. Crosse & Blackwell, Ltd.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided December 20, 1932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWhalen, J.

This is a motion for summary judgment. The plaintiffs proceed on a written guaranty executed by this defendant, guaranteeing the payment of the dividend on the preferred stock of Crosse & Blackwell, Inc. The defense set forth in the affidavit in opposition is that Crosse & Blackwell, Inc., has been dissolved, and, therefore, the guaranty is no longer operative.

At the argument I was of the opinion that it will be an issue of fact as to whether or not the extinction of Crosse & Blackwell, Inc., was brought about in good faith or otherwise. I have since read the cases cited by the defendant, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lorillard v. . ClydeNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Columbus Trust Co. v. MoshierNew York Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Mason v. Standard Distilling & Distributing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  4. Stannard v. Robert H. Reid & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  5. Columbus Trust Co. v. MoshierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pernet v. Peabody Engineering Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API