Legal Opinion

Purcell v. Thomas

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 29, 2011No. 09-CV-501, 10-CV-485PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEADMAN, Senior Judge:

In these consolidated appeals involving an award of attorney fees, two distinct but related matters are presented to us for resolution. George Purcell and Fedora, Inc. argue that the trial court erred in awarding attorney fees to Marva Thomas approximately six years after Thomas obtained a sizeable judgment against them in the underlying sexual harassment suit, which was subsequently upheld on appeal. Thomas argues that the trial court erred in determining that appellants’ supersede-as bond obtained to stay the judgment during the appeal did not cover Thomas’s…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Poplar Grove Planting and Refining Co., Inc. v. Bache Halsey Stuart, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  3. Kountze v. Omaha Hotel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Dyer v. BilaalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Federal Prescription Service, Inc. v. American Pharmaceutical Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. JOHN DOE NO. 1 v. SUSAN L. BURKEDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Paige International, Inc. v. Xl Speciality Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  3. JOHN DOE NO. 1 v. SUSAN L. BURKEDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Zuniga v. Whiting-Turner Contracting Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API