Legal Opinion
Muhammad v. United States Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service
City of Cleveland Municipal Court
Decided December 20, 2010No. 2010 CVI 19759PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Keough, Kathleen Ann, Judge.
{¶ 1} Magistrate’s decision, including findings of fact and conclusions of law, is hereby approved and confirmed.
{¶ 2} Judgment is for defendant on the complaint at plaintiffs costs.
Findings of Fact
{¶ 3} In a letter dated July 16, 2009, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) told plaintiff that his 2005 Federal income tax return was “frivolous * * * [with] no basis in the law [and] reflects a desire to delay or impede the administration of Federal tax laws.”
{¶ 4} Plaintiff is now suing the IRS, a bureau of the United States Department of the Treasury, in the Small…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Phillips v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Brushaber v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Charles Dowd Box Co. v. CourtneySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Gulf Offshore Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Tarver v. IRS Dept.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016