Legal Opinion

Neville v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 31, 1890PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Jones District Court. — Hon. J. H. Preston, Judge. Action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff in consequence of negligence and wrongful acts on the part of defendant. There was a trial by jury, and a verdict and judgment for plaintiff. The defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

On the first day of February, 1888, plaintiff was an employe of ' defendant; and, in the discharge of his duties, was required to assist in switching cars in the town of Strawberry Hill. On the day named a locomotive engine of defendant, in charge of an engineer and fireman, was run onto a sidetrack of defendant in Strawberry Hill, for the purpose of removing a coal-car therefrom, and placing it on another sidetrack, known as the “Wood track.” The front end of the engine was coupled to the car by means of the pilot-bar, and was then run backwards, drawing the car, until the latter was clear…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hoeft v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
  2. Edwards v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  3. Gibson v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  4. Reitman v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Rich v. MooreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API