Legal Opinion
Morton v. County of Erie
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 19, 2019No. 18-3085Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
18‐3085 Morton v. County of Erie UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION ASUMMARY ORDER@). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Darnell v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- Motorola Credit Corp. v. UzanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.