Legal Opinion

Fitzrandolph v. . Norman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 5, 1817Published

1Opinion

I shall state the points and then give the answers on each question submitted to this Court.

1st Question: was it lawful for the defendants to give evidence of possession prior to 1780 and 1782, the commencement of the only title they exhibited?

Answer: The defendants rested their defense upon length of possession, connected with a chain of circumstances, as evidence to presume a grant had once issued. And it was quite immaterial whether the grant issued to that person under whom they immediately claimed, or whether it issued to any person or persons no way connected with them. It is a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Den Ex Dem. Carson v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1836
  2. Graham v. . HoustonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1833
  3. John Den on Dem. Rogers v. MabeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1833
  4. Doe on Dem. of Taylor v. GoochSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1856
  5. Price v. . JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API