Legal Opinion

Smitheman v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 2, 1913No. 31938PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The Reporters’ statement of the case: The grounds upon which the motion stands will be found set forth in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHoyucsr, J.

Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Isthmian Canal Commission for furnishing 250,000 pounds of colored cotton waste to be delivered on the Isthmus of Panama. Two distinct claims, involving two separate orders under the contract, are disclosed by the pleadings. First, a claim representing the amount of difference between the contract price and the amount allowed by defendants on 51,736 pounds of waste delivered by the plaintiff and used by the defendants. Second, a claim representing the amount charged to the plaintiff by the defendants as the excess cost of 49,911 pounds of waste…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Young v. BlackSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
  2. Fowle v. Common Council of AlexandriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1826

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Creek Nation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API