Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Bruestle v. Rich

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1953No. 33125Published

1Opinion of the CourtTaft, J.

This cause has been submitted to this court on the demurrer of the relator to the answer of respondents. Since the demurrer searches the record, if no cause of action is stated in the petition, then a judgment will be required dismissing the petition. The judgment to be rendered will therefore depend upon whether the petition states a cause of action, and, *20if it does, whether the answer alleges facts which constitute a defense to that cause of action.

The intervening petitioners contend that this “action * * * is at best an amicable action * * * and * * * the prior acts of * * * respondents in…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Madisonville Traction Company v. Saint Bernard Mining CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. United States v. Gettysburg Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Belovsky v. Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. WelchSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. New York v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API