Legal Opinion

In Re Bruyette

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 23, 1988No. 346-81PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarney, C.J.

(Ret.), Specially Assigned. Petitioner, Joseph Bruyette, was convicted and sentenced after pleading guilty to charges of breaking and entering, grand larceny, and assault and robbery. He appeals the superior court’s dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief. We reverse.

Petitioner raises several issues on appeal. First, he claims that his guilty pleas were not knowing and voluntary because of ineffective assistance of counsel. Second, he argues that he was deprived of effective assistance of counsel by losing the opportunity to accept a favorable plea offer that was later withdrawn.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re FisherSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  2. In Re RinglerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
  3. Bruyette v. MenardVermont Superior Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API