Legal Opinion

Dams v. Vinton Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1915No. Docket No. 5Published

Error to Wayne; Collingwood, J., presiding. Case by Jacob Dams against the Vinton Company ■for personal injuries. Judgment for defendant on a directed verdict. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This action is brought to recover damages for personal injuries received by plaintiff while in the employ of the defendant. At the close of the case for the plaintiff, the court directed a verdict in favor of the defendant. The case is brought here by writ of error.

*13There are several assignments of error, but the important question is: Did the court err in directing a verdict for defendant?

Plaintiff avers the negligence of the defendant was twofold:(1) Suitable machinery in good repair should have, been furnished him.(2) Plaintiff, being taken from his usual course of' employment and placed in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Coleman v. Turner Cartage Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API