Legal Opinion

Perez-Mendez v. Roseland Amusement & Development Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 8, 2003PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered March 15, 2002, which, in an action for personal injuries sustained in an alleged shooting on defendant amusement park’s premises and a third-party action by the amusement park against its insurer for a declaration of coverage, granted the insurer’s motion for summary judgment declaring that it is not obligated to defend or indemnify the amusement park, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The subject declaration was properly made upon a complaint alleging that plaintiff was “shot, assaulted, battered and attacked,” and a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mount Vernon Fire Insurance v. Creative Housing Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. U.S. Underwriters Insurance v. Val-Blue Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. M.J. Frenzy, LLC v. Utica National Insurance GroupAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API