Commonwealth v. Harvin
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurrence
CIRILLO, President Judge,
concurring.
I concur in Judge Wieand’s decision to affirm the trial court’s quashal of the complaint against Harvin thereby requiring the Commonwealth to file charges in the juvenile court. However, I can only concur in the result because I agree with the Commonwealth that once a child has been found guilty in a criminal proceeding, no other crimes involving that child, whether committed before or after the *76finding of guilt, can constitute a “delinquent act.” 42 Pa.C.S. § 6302. In my opinion, both the purpose of the Juvenile Act and the legislative intent behind the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RomeriSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. StewartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. CessnaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Kelly v. AytchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978