Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Commonwealth v. Harvin

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 27, 1990No. 1509Published

1Concurrence

CIRILLO, President Judge,

concurring.

I concur in Judge Wieand’s decision to affirm the trial court’s quashal of the complaint against Harvin thereby requiring the Commonwealth to file charges in the juvenile court. However, I can only concur in the result because I agree with the Commonwealth that once a child has been found guilty in a criminal proceeding, no other crimes involving that child, whether committed before or after the *76finding of guilt, can constitute a “delinquent act.” 42 Pa.C.S. § 6302. In my opinion, both the purpose of the Juvenile Act and the legislative intent behind the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RomeriSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. StewartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. CessnaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Kelly v. AytchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API