Legal Opinion
Hobbley v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 23, 1984No. AU-67PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
450 So.2d 332 (1984)
Mack HOBBLEY and Dorothy H. Hobbley, Appellants,
v.
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY, Appellee.
No. AU-67.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
May 23, 1984.
J. Dixon Bridgers, III of Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith & Cutler, Pensacola, for appellants.
Thomas E. Wheeler, Jr. of Fisher, Bell, Hahn & Schuster, Pensacola, for appellee.
JOANOS, Judge.
Mack Hobbley and Dorothy Hobbley appeal from the trial court's final judgment striking Count II of their complaint a claim for damages for physical discomfort and embarrassment. The issue before us is whether the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hodges v. A. P. Fries & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1894
- Brook v. GaleSupreme Court of Florida · 1874
- Northamerican Van Lines, Inc. v. RoperDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- HCPD., INC. v. WhiteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
3Cited by11 opinions
- T.D.S. Incorporated v. Shelby Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Johns-Manville Sales Corp. v. JanssensDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Capitol Environmental Services, Inc. v. Earth Tech, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Bland v. FREIGHTLINER LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2002
- T.D.S. Inc. v. Shelby Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.