Putnam County Savings Bank v. Aditya
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*841The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the appellants’ joint cross motion, made with nonparties 40 Glastonbury, LLC, HS Eagle Road Associates, LLC, 33 Broad Street Restaurant Group, LLC, and Route 9 Poughkeepsie, LLC, for leave to amend their pleadings in these three related actions to add the nonparties as third-party plaintiffs. “Where the proposed amended pleading is palpably insufficient or patently devoid of merit, or where the delay in seeking the amendment would cause prejudice or surprise, the motion for leave to amend should be denied” (Lucido v Mancuso, 49…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lucido v. MancusoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- WIT Holding Corp. v. KleinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Mendelovitz v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Paribas Properties, Inc. v. BensonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Ross v. DeLorenzoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Canzona v. AtanasioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Young v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Potruch & Daab, LLC v. AbrahamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- 30-40 East Main Street Bayshore, Inc. v. Republic Franklin InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- 30-40 East Main Street Bayshore, Inc. v. Republic Franklin InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.