Legal Opinion

People v. Gunnett

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 17, 1990No. Docket 112737PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendants were charged with gross indecency with a person of the opposite sex in violation of MCL 750.338b; MSA 28.570(2). The trial court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss, finding the statute unconstitutional as applied to husband and wife. This Court reversed, finding the statute constitutional as applied to the facts of the case, and remanded for trial. People v Gunnett, 158 Mich App 420; 404 NW2d 627 (1987). Upon reinstatement of the charges, the trial court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss for the prosecution’s failure to exercise due diligence in identifying res gestae…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. People v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  3. In Re MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  4. People v. PearsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  5. People v. CummingsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. WolfordMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. People v. DeMeyersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. People v. PremenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. People of Michigan v. Cedrick Ledale TaylorMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. People v. DeMeyersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API