Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Professional Advertising Directors Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 11, 2007No. 4D06-3583PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal stems from a case that proceeded to trial on the matter of damages alone after the defendant’s answer was stricken as a sanction for discovery misconduct. The defendant challenges both the trial court’s decision to strike his answer and the damages award. We find merit in the defendant’s claim that the striking of his pleadings was an abuse of discretion under the circumstances of this case and reverse the order appealed.

The striking of a party’s pleadings as a sanction for discovery misconduct is authorized pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.380. The striking of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mercer v. RaineSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  2. Kozel v. OstendorfSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  3. Ham v. DunmireSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  4. Born v. GoldsteinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  5. Boca Developers, Inc. v. Fine Decorators, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cook v. CUSTOM MARINE DISTRIBUTING, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  2. Sonson v. HearnDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  3. Heritage Circle Condominium Ass'n v. State, Florida Department of Business & Professional Regulation, Division of Condominiums, Timeshares & Mobile HomesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  4. MOSHE ZUCHAER v. PENINSULA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API