Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 8, 2003No. 1D02-0212PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Appellant, Torrie O. Smith, challenges the consecutive minimum mandatory sentences he received pursuant to section 775.087(2)(d), Florida Statutes (2000), the “10-20-Life” statute, for crimes involving a firearm. Appellant contends that, under the authority of Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993), Palmer v. State, 438 So.2d 1 (Fla.1983), and other recent case law, the trial court was required to impose appellant’s minimum mandatory sentences concurrently because the convictions arose from the same criminal episode.

Appellant is correct in asserting that when minimum mandatory terms are re*407qui…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hale v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. Palmer v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  3. State v. ClayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  4. Perreault v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  5. Wilchcombe v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Elozar v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API