Legal Opinion
Haslbeck v. Commissioner, Social Security
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided September 24, 2019No. 1:18-cv-00581Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND EDNA FAYE H., * * Plaintiff, * * Civil No. TMD 18-581 v. * * * ANDREW M. SAUL, * Commissioner of Social Security, * * Defendant.1 * ************ MEMORANDUM OPINION GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR REMAND Plaintiff Edna H. seeks judicial review under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant” or the “Commissioner”) denying her application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. Before the Court are Plaintiff’s pro se Motion for Summary…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Melkonyan v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Ronda S. CRAIG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Sullivan v. ZebleySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.