Legal Opinion

Scheinwald v. Scheinwald

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1960PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMario Pittoni, J.

Motion to modify defendant wife’s demand for a bill of particulars is granted.

This is an action for annulment based on the defendant’s alleged fraud, prior to the marriage, of falsely representing *176to the plaintiff that she would have children after the marriage, and that she would engage in normal sexual intercourse within a certain time after the marriage.

Item 2 seeks to find out in whose presence the representations were made. This case presents no special or unusual circumstances which requires a deviation from the general rule that a party is not required to furnish the names of witnesses…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCready v. Island Park-Long Beach, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  2. Mertz v. de LandaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  3. Rustin v. RustinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McLure v. GrecoNew York Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Jesmer v. BeymaNew York Family Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API