Legal Opinion

In re the Dependency of J.S.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 13, 2002No. 48881-3-IPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBecker, C.J.

A parent whose child is the subject of a dependency action may propose a properly qualified adoptive placement for the child. A statute requires the Department of Social and Health Services to follow that preference if the parent agrees to a termination of parental rights and a court finds the placement to be in the best interest of the child. In this case, where the child was already thriving with relatives who were willing to adopt him, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that it was not in the child’s best interest to be placed with a new adoptive family chosen by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re the Welfare of AschauerWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. BrightWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. BrightWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. New Hope of Washington v. RamquistCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  5. Scott v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Dependency of JSCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  2. In Re The Dependency Of: J.d.p. And J.d.p.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  3. In re the Welfare of B.D.F.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  4. In Re Dependency of RwCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  5. In re the Dependency of R.W.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API