Legal Opinion

United States v. Byron

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided May 3, 1915No. 6726PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Carlos U. Byron and another were indicted for crime.

1Opinion of the Court

BEAN, District Judge.

Defendants were indicted for a violation of the latter clause of section 29 of the Criminal Code, which reads as follows:

“Whoever shall transmit to, or present at, or cause or procure to be transmitted to, or presented at, any office or officer of the government of the United States, any deed, power of attorney, order, certificate, receipt, contract, or other writing, in support of, or in relation to, any account or claim, with intent to defraud the United States, knowing the same to be false, altered, forged, or counterfeited,” etc., shall he punished accordingly.

It is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. StaatsSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
  2. Ladd Ex Rel. Montgomery v. LaddSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  3. United States v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. United States v. KesselDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1894

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Kessler v. Mercur Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  2. United States Ex Rel. Starr v. MulliganCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  3. United States Ex Rel. Rodriguez v. Weekly Publications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1946
  4. United States v. TiegerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1954
  5. United States v. McNinchDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API