Legal Opinion

In re Companhia de Navegacao Lloyd Brasileiro

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided July 1, 1925No. 17429PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BEATTIE, District Judge.

Long after answers had boon filed by the cargo owners as claimants to the petition for limitation of liability, and long after much testimony had been taken on behalf of petitioner, and after the claimants had applied for a commission dedimus potosiatem to examine witnesses in Vera Cruz, Mexico, and after strenuous objection by petitioner to the granting of said dedimus potestatem except with the privilege .of oral examination of said witnesses by the petitioner, and after the ruling of this court on that question and said dedimus potestatem was ordered to be executed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. International Navigation Co. v. Farr & Bailey Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. The Carib PrinceSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. The S. S. HewittDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1922
  4. In re Davidson S. S. Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1904
  5. The John H. StarinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wessel, Duval & Co. v. Charleston Lighterage & Transfer Co.District Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API