Legal Opinion
Cardenas v. Geico Casualty Co.
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided January 13, 2011No. 8:09-cv-2357-T-23TBMPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
STEVEN D. MERRYDAY, District Judge.
On October 21, 2009, the plaintiff sued (Doc. 2) and alleged bad faith failure to settle a claim under an automobile insurance policy. On November 18, 2009, the defendant removed (Doc. 1) and sufficiently alleged diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The parties file (Docs. 34, 36) cross-motions for summary judgment. Each party responds (Docs. 37, 39) in opposition.
Undisputed Facts 1
Pedro Cardenas procured from Geico Casualty Company (“Geico”) an insurance policy that provides coverage from April 12, 2006, to October 12, 2006, for damages…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. LaforetSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- Boston Old Colony Ins. Co. v. GutierrezSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
- Cunningham v. Standard Guar. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1994
- MacOla v. Government Employees Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2006
- DeLaune v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Heather R. Eres v. Progressive American Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- Maharaj v. Geico Casualty Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2014
- Baranowski v. Geico Gen. Ins. Co.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2019
- Denno v. GEICO General Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2022
- Pratt v. Government Employees Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2023
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.