Keathley v. . Branch
Supreme Court of North Carolina
EjbctmeNT tried at August Special Term, 1882, of Dupeik Superior Court, before Gilliam, J. Judgment for plaintiff'; appeal by defendant, Stanford.
1Opinion of the CourtRuffin, J.
It is evident from the statement of the ease, that two exceptions were intended to be taken in the court below for the defendant, Stanford, who alone appeals.
The first one, however, is so obscurely stated and some of the facts in regard to it so evidently misstated, that it is impossible for the court to understand its meaning, or determine its force. It is much the same, indeed, with the other, though enough can be extracted from the case to enable the court to detect, what it conceives to be, an error in the ruling of the judge upon it.
The question is one of pleading and evidence, arising…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- stephen.W. Isler v. . William Foy and F. B. HarrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
3Cited by1 opinion
- Farrior v. . HoustonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886