Paul Christopher Hildwin v. State of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
Paul Christopher Hildwin appeals from the denial of postconviction relief in this death penalty case. We reverse and conclude that newly discovered evidence that identifies the donor of DNA left at the crime scene compels that a new trial be granted.1 The newly discovered DNA evidence now establishes that the victim’s boyfriend, William Haverty, and not the defendant, Hildwin, was the provider of biological material found on two items at the crime scene: a pair of women’s underwear and a white washcloth. Importantly, this new scientific evidence completely changes the nature of the evidence…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
- Green v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Mark James Asay v. State of Florida, SC16-102 Mark James Asay v. Julie L. Jones, etc. & SC16-628 Mark James Asay v. Julie L. Jones, etc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2016
- Steven Richard Taylor v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2018
- Walton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2018
- Karen Whitney v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- State of Florida v. Raymond Morrison, Jr.Supreme Court of Florida · 2017
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.