Legal Opinion

Burton v. Cowles' Administratrix

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 25, 1913PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Shelby Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Nunn

Affirming.

*101This controversy originated from a deed of date March, 1902, hy James P. Cowles and wife to J. B. Burton, Anna Bell Burton and James S. Burton conveying 211 acres, 3 rods and 921-4 poles at the price of $17,000.00. The deed is in the ordinary form, and closes as follows:

‘‘Together with all and singular the appurtenances ■and with covenant of general warranty.”

It appears from the petition that the appellants, Bur-tons, discovered for the first time in 1911, that there was not the amount of land contained in the deed as stipulated. They claim they had…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nave v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900
  2. Salyer v. BlessingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  3. Biggs v. Lexington & Big Sandy RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1881

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jordan v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  2. Harlan v. BuckleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API