Legal Opinion

Belridge Oil Co. v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided August 16, 1932No. Docket No. 31218PublishedCited by 7 opinions

"Actual cash value" of an option, paid in for capital stock, determined for invested capital purposes.

1Opinion of the Court

*816OPINION.

MokRis :

While the respondent’s deficiency notice covers deficiencies for the years 1921 to 1923, inclusive, and while the petition states that the taxes “ in controversy are income and profits taxes for the years 1921 to 1923, inclusive,” the said petition, as amended, fails to allege error on the part of the respondent in other than the year 1921, and, since the evidence adduced at the hearing was confined to the issues pertaining exclusively to the year 1921, the respondent’s motion, made at the hearing, to affirm his determination of the deficiencies for 1922 and 1923 is granted.

Our…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wobber Bros. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934
  2. Willamette Indus. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1995
  3. Behles v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934
  4. Langwell Real Estate Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934
  5. Belridge Oil Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API