Legal Opinion

Ruffino v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 23, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Order unanimously reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and taxable disbursements to appellant, and motion to dismiss the complaint granted, with ten dollars costs.

Plaintiff seeks to recover benefits on a policy of accident insurance which provides for the payment of weekly indemnity and also for the payment of one-third of the principal for loss of sight of one eye. There is no basis for the claim for weekly indemnity because plaintiff was not wholly and continuously disabled from the date of the accident, as provided in clause 1, or within two weeks from the date of the accident, as…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Browning v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.Utah Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Lapkin v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNew York Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API