Anderson v. Anderson
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco allowing alimony, costs, and counsel fees in an action for divorce. Frank H. Kerrigan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
After the plaintiff had commenced this action for a divorce from the defendant the superior court made an order requiring the defendant to pay to her a certain sum of money for costs and counsel fees for the prosecution of the suit, and also an additional amount as alimony for the support of herself and infant child during the pendency of the action. Prom this order defendant has appealed.
Upon the hearing of the plaintiff’s application for the order the financial ability of the defendant was shown, and the court found that the plaintiff is without any individual means to prosecute the action…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cowan v. CowanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pedersen v. PedersenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Youree v. YoureeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905