Legal Opinion

Leshem v. Leshem

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided January 26, 1949PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Seitz, Vice-Chancellor:

Defendant has moved to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint seeking to require the defendant to transfer a retail liquor business to the plaintiff pursuant to their alleged oral agreement.

Since this is the decision on the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint, the allegations of the complaint must be taken to be true. The complaint shows that the plaintiff and the defendant are brothers. In April 1939 the plaintiff had agreed to purchase a retail liquor business from the owner of the business for the sum of $2,300. The plaintiff and his brother Max Leshem asked the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Eisenman v. SeitzCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1942

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hastings Associates, Inc. v. Local 369 Building Fund, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
  2. Della Corporation v. DiamondSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API