Legal Opinion

Watkins v. Pennell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 22, 1970No. 1 Div. 566PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal is from a final decree granting appellee relief on a cross bill wherein he contended that certain lots described in the pleading were due to be impressed with an equitable mortgage in his favor. Appellant contends that the trial court committed error in granting this relief.

It appears from the pleading and the evidence that appellant, Chinester Watkins, is *209the widow of Lucius Watkins, deceased. Born to their union are two minors, Gladys Marie and Lucius Watkins, Jr.,‘who joined their mother as complainants below. They filed their bill of complaint as amended seeking a decree of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thompson v. New England Mortgage Security Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  2. Turner v. BernheimerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  3. Freed v. SalladeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  4. Hewett v. McGasterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  5. Lazenby v. LazenbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. First Alabama Bank of Dothan v. RenfroSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  2. Gardner v. RobertsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  3. Dobbs v. HuffstutlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API