Legal Opinion

Thomson Spot Welder Co. v. Oldberg Manfg. Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1926No. Docket No. 25PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

October 5, 1915, the United States circuit court of appeals, first circuit, in a suit in equity, for infringement of letters patent, No. 1,046,066, known as the Harmatta patent, held the patent valid. Thomson Electric Welding Co. v. Barney & Berry, 227 Fed. 428. January 30, 1317, plaintiff, owner of the patent, by written contract licensed defendant to operate spot and point welding machines under the patent, and defendant agreed to pay specified royalties quarterly. July 13, 1920, this suit was commenced to recover the royalties due up to that date. Defendant, under plea of the general…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Marston v. . SwettNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Thomson Spot Welder Co. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Sewall v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. Marston v. . SwettNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  5. Strong v. Carver Cotton Gin Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rubsam Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Thomson Spot Welder Co. v. Fairbanks Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  3. Thomson Spot Welder Co. v. Oldberg Manfg. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Acme Chair & Metal Crafts Co. v. Northern Corrugating Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Wilson v. Norge CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API