Legal Opinion
Enders v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 3, 1911No. Nos. 1,726, 1,729PublishedCited by 7 opinions
In Error to the District Court of the United States fo’r the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Illinois. Edward Enders and Henry Hinn were convicted of violating the oleomargarine law, and they bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtGrosscup, Circuit Judge
The plaintiffs in error were tried and found guilty upon the first and thirteenth counts of an indictment, the essential parts of which counts-are as follows:
“Did knowingly, wilfully and unlawfully carry on the business of manufacturers of oleomargarine, in that they (the plaintiffs in error], being then *756and there persons that sold, vended and furnished oleomargarine for the use and consumption of others except their own family tables without compensation, did then and there add to and mix with said oleomargarine artificial coloration that caused it to look like butter of a shade of yellow,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. GoodingSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- United States v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jelke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1918
- Kelly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
- Capone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932
- Graham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- May v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.