Legal Opinion

Culliford v. Gadd

The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo

Decided January 29, 1892PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from jury term. Action by Elizabeth A. Oulliford against Montgomery Gadd for fraudulent representations. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals from the judgment and order denying a motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtGildersleeve, J.

This action is for damages sustained by the plaintiff through the fraudulent representations of the defendant. In January, 1889, at the request of the defendant, and by reason of representations that the defendant had made, the plaintiff, through her husband as agent, subscribed and paid $1,000 to a syndicate for the development of an alleged secret process for the filtration of water. The plaintiff alleges in her complaint that, at various times before her parting with the $1,000 as aforesaid, the defendant, with intent to defraud her, represented to her “that he and one Edward L. Tamsen…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Aldridge v. . AldridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Allen v. AddingtonNew York Supreme Court · 1831
  3. Murphy v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Raymond v. HowlandNew York Supreme Court · 1834
  5. Schumaker v. MatherNew York Supreme Court · 1891

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. SchriverCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API