Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Dery v. DeCostole Carting, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 19, 2001Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Krausman, J. P.,

concurs in part and dissents in part and votes to modify the order appealed from by deleting the provision thereof denying the motion of the defendant DeCostole Carting, Inc., d/b/a DCI Container Service for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it and substituting therefor a provision grant*510ing that motion, with the following memorandum: I disagree with my colleagues’ conclusion that there is an issue of fact as to whether the defendant DeCostole Carting, Inc., d/b/a DCI Container Service (hereinafter DeCostole) can be held…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ferrer v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Sullivan v. LocastroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Baker v. Sportservice Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. Goodman v. 78 West 47th Street Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Boehm v. TelferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API