Legal Opinion · Dissent
Hewitt v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided November 28, 1931No. A-7975Published
1DissentDavenport, P. J.
In dissenting from the opinion of the majority of the court, I do so for the reason that, after a careful study and examination of the authorities, I have reached the conclusion that the information upon which the defendants in this case were tried is duplicitous. Omitting the caption and signature, the charging part of the information is as follows:
“That they, the said R. W. Hewitt, Fred Browning and Wallace Foreman, and other parties named in the information * * * did then and there unlawfully, wilfully, and feloniously, open, conduct and carry on and cause to be opened, conducted and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- De Graff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
- Bowes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1919
- Kimbrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
- Reed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1920
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.