Legal Opinion

Rosenbloom v. Maas

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 3, 1905Published

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Fourth District. Action by Hyman Rosenbloom and others against Tillie Maas. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBischoff, J.

Though originally in form to enforce a mechanics’ lien, the action proceeded by consent as one to recover damages for the defendant’s prevention of the plaintiffs’ performance of a contract between the parties, whereby the latter had undertaken to make certain repairs to the former’s buildings for the agreed compensation of $350. Upon the trial, it appeared that it would have required about two weeks’ time to complete the work, involving an outlay to the plaintiffs for materials and labor, and that after the plaintiffs had been engaged in the performance of the work for about two days the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wakeman v. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Devlin v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. Baldwin v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1854
  4. Carlisle v. BarnesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  5. Hunt v. TestSupreme Court of Alabama · 1845

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API